EU commission seeks punishment in Poland in line with liberty – GCFRNG

EU commission seeks punishment in Poland in line with liberty – GCFRNG

The European Commission is asking the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to blame Poland on a daily basis for failing to heed his court’s decision by the Supreme Court, escalating controversy over the independence of the judiciary.

The chairman of the committee, Ursula von der Leyen, said the declaration of a media system across the European Union must be fair and just.

In mid-July, the EU’s highest court ruled that the warning court of the Polish Supreme Court did not guarantee impartiality and freedom, thus violating EU law.

Established in 2018, the court could dismiss any judge or attorney general, leading some to fear it could be used against unscrupulous judges, and -s restrict their freedom.

The commissioner, who initiated the ECJ process against Warsaw, gave Poland one month to explain how to make a high court decision based on Luxembourg. Otherwise, it will face financial constraints.

In August, Warsaw assured Brussels that it would lower the chamber by implementing reforms within a month. But this response did not satisfy the EU branch, which serves as the treaty’s custodian.

The commissioner said the Polish statement spoke of the intention to demolish the warning house in its current form, but did not give further details. The building continued to operate, the commission added.

According to the PAP media agency, the court still has 66 cases pending against judges in August, including 19 disciplinary cases and 24 cases involving the exclusion of sentencing.

Poland condemns European Commission request for financial sanctions.

Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro wrote in a tweet that “Legally, we are fighting against Poland.”

The disputed institution is a major court-appointed tribunal introduced by the Judicial Service Commission (PiS), which is a major dispute between the Polish government and EU officials, who fear that these changes fall short of freedom of expression.
The PiS government guarding the country was arguing that this change — part of the execution of a change of judgment — was a necessary change, and accused the ECJ of making political decisions.

In theory, financial penalties could get you millions of euros fast. In another case, the ECJ threatened Poland that it would lose a minimum of 100,000 euros per day in 2017. At that time, the court ordered Poland to stop entering the protected Bialowieza forest.

An EU official said the situation of anonymity and imposing sanctions for compliance with the ECJ’s decision was “exceptional” with a few exceptions.

Ultimately, it will be up to the EU’s highest court to decide whether it will be fair in Poland. An EU document states, “We do not have much money in mind.”

An ECJ spokesman told the dpa that they could not say how long it would take to process the commission’s request, but that such cases were often quick.

Check For More Information Below

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *